The Second Arrow: The Buddha's Teaching on Pain

By Tim Yu, Founder & Editor · Published 8 June 2026 · Updated 14 September 2026

Checked against the primary texts · How we check · Report a correction

The parable of the second arrow is one of the Buddha’s most useful teachings: when life hurts, that is the first arrow — often unavoidable. But the resistance, dread, and self-pity we heap on top is a second arrow we fire into ourselves.

Pain may be given to us; much of our suffering, the Buddha taught, we manufacture — and can learn to put down.

The story

In the Sallatha Sutta, the Buddha asks a simple question: what is the difference between an ordinary, “untaught” person and a trained disciple when pain strikes? Both, he says, feel physical pain — the awakened are not made of stone. But the untaught person, touched by a painful feeling, “sorrows, grieves, and laments, beats his breast, becomes distraught.” And so, the Buddha says, that person “feels two pains, physical and mental” — as if “shot with an arrow and, right afterward, shot with a second arrow.”

The well-trained disciple, struck by the same painful feeling, does not add the second. They feel the first arrow — the bodily pain — clearly and fully, but they do not pile on resistance, panic, and despair. “They feel one pain: physical, but not mental.”

What the second arrow is

The first arrow is the raw event: the illness, the insult, the loss, the unpleasant sensation. We rarely control it. The second arrow is everything we do with it — and it is almost always worse than the first.

It is the spiral of this shouldn’t be happening to me. It is replaying the argument for the hundredth time, dreading a pain that hasn’t come yet, resenting the world for the wound, telling ourselves a story in which the hurt means we are a failure or that things will never be all right. None of that is the original pain. It is a second shaft, fired by our own hand, into the wound the first arrow made.

The liberating news is exactly there. We cannot always stop the first arrow — but the second is ours. And what is ours to fire is also ours to lay down.

What the sutta says happens next

Most retellings stop at the two arrows. The discourse does not, and what comes after them is the part that makes it more than a lesson in endurance. Having described the second arrow, the Buddha explains the machinery behind it:

Three things follow. First, the discourse puts something underneath the reaction. Resisting pain is not a free-standing mistake; it is where an “underlying tendency for aversion” takes hold — in Pali, an anusaya. What the sutta describes is not one bad moment but a disposition the moment rests on.

Second, and this is the sentence most summaries leave out: the untaught person reaches for pleasure as the only exit they know. Hurt, we go looking for something nice — the drink, the scroll, the second helping, the purchase we will regret. The point is not that the pleasure is wicked. It is that a mind which knows no other way out of pain is bound to pleasure, and the sutta says so in the next breath: because they look forward to sensual pleasures, “the underlying tendency to greed for pleasant feeling” underlies that too. The same blow that fires the second arrow tightens the grip of craving.

Third, the discourse closes the sequence by calling such a person one who “is attached to rebirth, old age, and death” and, at the last, “attached to suffering.” Aversion and craving turn out to be two ends of one reflex. That is why so short a teaching carries more than it looks: it is not stoicism about pain, it is an account of how pain manufactures craving.

Where the second arrow comes from

The teaching is from the Sallatha Sutta (“The Arrow”), SN 36.6, in the Pali Canon’s collection on feeling (vedanā). It is one of the clearest statements anywhere of a theme that runs through the whole of Buddhism: the Second Noble Truth, that suffering arises not from events alone but from our craving and resistance toward them. The second arrow is that truth made into a single unforgettable image.

Nor is it a Theravada peculiarity. A full parallel survives in Chinese, as discourse 470 of the Saṃyukta Āgama (箭; Taishō vol. 2, 119c), the Chinese counterpart collection to the Pali Saṃyutta Nikāya. There the image is sharper still — the ordinary person is like a man “who’s been shot by a pair of poison arrows” — and the discourse names what holds such a person in place: they are “bound by craving, dislike, and delusion” (trans. Charles Patton). Two transmission lineages, in different languages and different canons, kept the same teaching. Shantideva’s much-quoted verse — if there’s a remedy, why be unhappy? — later put a close cousin of the point as a question: what does dejection add to a trouble you can either fix or not?

Does the sutta say suffering is optional?

“Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional” is the line the second arrow travels under in English, and it catches the shape of the teaching well. But it is not the sutta’s language: the phrase appears nowhere in the discourse, in Bhikkhu Sujato’s translation or Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu’s. The distance between the two claims is worth holding onto.

What SN 36.6 describes is a “learned noble disciple” — someone already trained — of whom the Buddha says, “When they’re touched by painful feeling, they don’t resist it.” That is a capacity, reported; the slogan is a choice, promised. And even that capacity does not repeal the first arrow. The canon is blunt about this in the Buddha’s own case, when a splinter cut his foot:

The pain is real, sharp, and not hidden. What is missing is the second arrow.

This matters most for the people who meet this teaching in the worst weather — chronic pain, grief, depression. Told that suffering is optional, and finding that they cannot simply stop, they take the failure as their own, which is a third arrow nobody needed. Read as the sutta has it, the picture is both kinder and more accurate: what the discourse describes is the fruit of training, not a switch — and noticing the second arrow at all, even long after it has flown, is where the training begins.

How to stop firing the second arrow

The practice is not to feel less but to add less. The discourse itself says where the difference lies: the trained disciple, unlike the untaught person, “understands an escape from painful feeling apart from sensual pleasures” and truly understands feelings’ “origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape.” The early texts train that seeing in the second foundation of mindfulness — observing feeling as feeling, watching in it “the liability to originate, to vanish” rather than arguing with it (Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, MN 10, trans. Bhikkhu Sujato). In practice that comes down to a few moves:

• Catch the gap. Between the first arrow (the pain) and the second (the reaction) there is a moment. Mindfulness widens that moment, so that resistance becomes a choice rather than a reflex.
• Name the two arrows. When you are hurting, ask: what is the actual pain here, and what am I adding? Simply seeing the difference loosens the second arrow’s grip.
• Let the first arrow be. Resisting pain is itself a second arrow. Allowing the raw feeling to be present — without the story that it must not be — often takes most of the suffering out of it.
• Drop the future arrows. Much of the second arrow is anticipation — dreading pain that hasn’t arrived. Returning to the present disarms it.
• Notice the reach. The second arrow is usually followed by a hand reaching for relief. SN 36.6 puts that reach inside the same sequence rather than treating it as a separate failing — so catching it is as much the practice as catching the story.

This is why the second arrow is so beloved by people facing anxiety, chronic pain, and grief: it does not promise a life without hurt, which would be a lie. It offers something truer and more freeing — that most of what we suffer is the part we add, and that part can be released. (To practise spotting the two arrows in a moment of your own, try our guided second-arrow reflection. For the wider teaching, see the Four Noble Truths and the meaning of dukkha; for the practice, mindfulness and meeting anxiety. For the Buddha’s other arrow parable — on the questions not worth asking — see the poisoned arrow. For more stories like this, return to our guide to Buddhist parables.)