Types of Buddhism: The Branches and Major Schools Explained
Buddhism is not a single monolith but a family of traditions. It is usually divided into three great branches — Theravāda (“the Way of the Elders”), Mahāyāna (“the Great Vehicle”), and Vajrayāna (“the Diamond Vehicle”) — each with its own texts, methods, and emphasis, and each containing further schools such as Zen, Pure Land, and the orders of Tibetan Buddhism.
Yet all of them share one root: the same Buddha, the same Four Noble Truths, and the same Noble Eightfold Path. This guide maps the branches without flattening them. (For where each is practised today, country by country, see Buddhism around the world; for the land where it began, see Buddhism in India.)
Why Buddhism Has Branches at All
When the Buddha died (around the 5th–4th century BCE), he left no single appointed successor and no fixed written scripture — his teachings were preserved orally by the community of monks and nuns. Over the centuries that followed, as Buddhism spread across India and then out across Asia, that shared inheritance was carried into dozens of languages and cultures, remembered through different lineages, and emphasised in different ways. Branches were the natural result — not, for the most part, bitter schisms, but divergent streams flowing from one source.
The early community eventually divided into a number of schools — tradition counts eighteen — among which the most consequential split was between the Sthavira (“Elders”) and the Mahāsāṃghika (“Great Community”) lineages. Theravāda traces its lineage to that elder line and is the sole survivor of those early schools. Around the beginning of the Common Era, a new movement took shape within Indian Buddhism that called itself Mahāyāna; and later, from roughly the 6th century onward, the tantric methods of Vajrayāna developed out of Mahāyāna. None of this erased what came before. Scholars differ on how to describe the relation: Access to Insight says Mahāyāna grew out of one of the early schools, while Jonathan Silk, in Britannica, argues that it “should not be seen as the successor to an earlier established tradition”, since Mahāyāna and non-Mahāyāna sources show mutual influence and the differences are “usually more a matter of degree and emphasis than of basic opposition”.
So the branches are best read not as a story of fracture but as one of adaptation: the Dharma taking root in Sri Lankan, Chinese, Tibetan, Japanese, and many other soils, and growing accordingly.
- Three branches
- Theravāda (the Way of the Elders), Mahāyāna (the Great Vehicle) and Vajrayāna (the Diamond Vehicle).
- Shared core
- All share the same Buddha, the same Four Noble Truths and the same Noble Eightfold Path.
- Theravāda
- The only surviving early non-Mahāyāna school; scriptures the Pali Canon (Tipiṭaka); Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Laos; ideal the arahant.
- Mahāyāna
- Arose around the beginning of the Common Era; adds many later sūtras; China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam; ideal the bodhisattva.
- Vajrayāna
- Grew out of Mahāyāna from roughly the 6th century onward; adds tantric texts and methods; Tibet, the Himalayan regions and Mongolia; ideal the bodhisattva.
- Four Tibetan orders
- Nyingma (the Ancient Ones), Kagyu (Oral Lineage), Sakya (Grey Earth) and Gelug (the Virtuous Tradition).
The Common Core: What All Buddhists Share
Before the differences, the agreements — because they are larger. Across virtually every school, Buddhists hold in common:
- The Three Jewels: taking refuge in the Buddha (the awakened teacher), the Dharma (his teaching), and the Sangha (the community of practitioners).
- The Four Noble Truths: that there is dukkha (suffering, unsatisfactoriness); that it arises from craving; that it can cease; and that a path leads to its cessation (SN 56.11).
- The Noble Eightfold Path: the practical training in ethics, meditation, and wisdom that leads out of suffering (SN 45.8).
- Karma and rebirth: that intentional actions have consequences, and that beings are reborn within the round of existence (saṃsāra) until liberated.
- The three marks of existence: impermanence (anicca), unsatisfactoriness (dukkha), and not-self (anattā).
- The goal of liberation: awakening — nirvāṇa — the end of craving and of suffering.
Two of those — the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path — are not a later summary laid over the traditions. The Buddha set them out together in the discourse traditionally counted as his first, spoken at Varanasi to the group of five monks, where the fourth truth simply is the Eightfold Path, named factor by factor (Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu renders dukkha here as “stress”; “suffering” is the more usual English choice):
And this, monks, is the noble truth of the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: precisely this Noble Eightfold Path — right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration.
The branches differ in how they interpret, extend, and prioritise this shared inheritance, but they do not abandon it. A Theravāda monk in Thailand, a Zen practitioner in Japan, and a Tibetan lama would recognise one another’s core commitments instantly. Keep that shared trunk in mind as we walk out along the branches.
Theravāda: The Way of the Elders
At a glance: “Way of the Elders” · the only surviving early non-Mahāyāna school · scriptural basis: the Pali Canon (Tipiṭaka) · predominant in Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos · spiritual ideal: the arahant.
Theravāda stays close to what it regards as the earliest record of the Buddha’s words. Britannica’s main Buddhism entry calls the early group that included it “more conservative”, though Jonathan Silk notes that some aspects of Mahāyāna, particularly in its earlier Indian forms, are “distinctly conservative, especially with respect to monastic ethics”. Its scriptures are the Pali Canon — the Tipiṭaka, or “Three Baskets” — preserved in the Pali language, and it is from this canon that most of the suttas cited across this site are drawn. The tradition traces its name and lineage to the Theras, the senior “Elders” of the first generations of the saṅgha.
Its spiritual ideal is the arahant: a person who, through their own sustained effort in ethics, meditation, and insight, uproots craving and reaches liberation in this very life. The emphasis tends to fall on monastic practice, careful study of the texts, and meditation — including the insight (vipassanā) practice that has become widely known in the modern world. Theravāda presents the Buddha first and foremost as a supremely awakened human teacher who showed the way, rather than as a divine saviour. Today it predominates across Sri Lanka and mainland Southeast Asia, in countries such as Thailand — whose forest monasteries gave rise to the renunciant Thai Forest Tradition.
Mahāyāna: The Great Vehicle
At a glance: “Great Vehicle” · arose around the beginning of the Common Era · a large additional body of Mahāyāna sūtras · predominant across China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam · spiritual ideal: the bodhisattva.
Mahāyāna is less a single school than a sprawling family of traditions, united by a few powerful ideas. The first is the bodhisattva ideal. Where the early texts’ ideal is the arahant, freed from rebirth, the bodhisattva vows to attain complete buddhahood for the sake of all beings. In 84000’s gloss, bodhisattvas “purposely opt to remain within cyclic existence in order to liberate all sentient beings”; whether that means postponing nirvana is a subtler question than it sounds. (Some Mahāyāna texts set this against an arahant who seeks only their own release; Theravāda rejects that picture, as arahant, buddha and bodhisattva explains.) Compassion (karuṇā), expressed as this universal aspiration (bodhicitta), moves to the very centre of the path.
The second is the teaching of emptiness (śūnyatā): the insight, developed especially by the philosopher Nāgārjuna, that nothing possesses a fixed, independent essence — everything arises dependently. The third is an expanded vision of reality, populated by countless celestial buddhas and bodhisattvas (such as Avalokiteśvara, the bodhisattva of compassion) who can be appealed to for help, alongside teachings on buddha-nature, the awakened potential said to be present in all beings. Mahāyāna also accepts a much broader scriptural canon, adding many later sūtras — the Lotus, the Heart and Diamond Sūtras, the Pure Land sūtras, and more — to the early material.
From this rich soil grew several distinct schools:

Zen (Chan)
Zen takes its name, through the Chinese Chan, from the Sanskrit dhyāna — “meditation” — and meditation is exactly its heart. It began in China and later became especially influential in Japan, shaping its arts and culture deeply. Zen prizes direct, wordless insight into one’s own nature over reliance on scripture or doctrine, a stance captured in the famous traditional verse describing it as “a special transmission outside the scriptures… pointing directly to the human mind.” Its tradition looks back to the semi-legendary monk Bodhidharma, said to have brought this approach to China. Later legend placed him in a cave above the Shaolin Temple, the monastery on Mount Song famous for its fighting monks. Practice centres on seated meditation (zazen) and, in some lineages, on the kōan — a riddle that cannot be solved by ordinary logic and so exhausts the thinking mind into a deeper seeing. (For how zazen is actually practised — posture and all — see our guide to Zen sitting meditation; and for Zen’s sister traditions across East Asia, Chan, Sŏn and Thiền.)
Pure Land
Pure Land is among the most widespread forms of Buddhism in East Asia, and the most devotional. Its focus is the Buddha Amitābha (Amida in Japan), the “Buddha of Infinite Light,” and his Pure Land, Sukhāvatī — a realm into which the sincere devotee aspires to be reborn, there to attain enlightenment with ease. Its central practice is beautifully simple: the heartfelt recitation of Amitābha’s name (nianfo in Chinese, nembutsu in Japanese — namu Amida Butsu). Where some paths stress strenuous self-effort, Pure Land leans on devotion and the saving vow of Amitābha, which has made it deeply accessible to ordinary lay people.
Nichiren
Founded by the fervent 13th-century Japanese monk Nichiren, this school holds that the highest teaching of the Buddha is contained in the Lotus Sūtra. Its signature practice is chanting the daimoku — the sūtra’s title — in the formula Namu-myōhō-renge-kyō (“Devotion to the Lotus Sūtra of the Wonderful Law”). Nichiren Buddhism remains one of the largest forms of Buddhism in Japan and has spread internationally through modern lay movements.
(Other Mahāyāna schools, such as the Tiantai/Tendai and Huayan traditions, developed sophisticated philosophies of their own; the three above are simply the most widely encountered today.)
Vajrayāna: The Diamond Vehicle
At a glance: “Diamond” or “Thunderbolt Vehicle” · grew out of Mahāyāna from roughly the 6th century onward · adds tantric texts and methods · predominant in Tibet, the Himalayan regions, and Mongolia · ideal: the bodhisattva, pursued by accelerated tantric means.
Vajrayāna grew out of Mahāyāna and keeps its bodhisattva goal and its philosophy of emptiness — it is sometimes counted as a wing of Mahāyāna rather than a wholly separate vehicle. What sets it apart is method. Vajrayāna employs the tantras: esoteric techniques said to bring awakening more swiftly, including the recitation of mantras — om mani padme hum above all — elaborate visualisation of buddhas and deities, meditation using maṇḍalas (symbolic diagrams of the cosmos), and ritual. The word vajra — “diamond” or “thunderbolt” — points to the indestructible, adamantine reality these methods aim to realise.
Because its techniques are powerful and easily misunderstood, Vajrayāna places exceptional weight on the guru (the lama), the qualified teacher who transmits the practices through personal initiation. Some initiations reach very large crowds: the Dalai Lama, his office reports, has explained that “there is a tradition associated with the Kalachakra Tantra of giving the empowerment to large gatherings,” and the office lists 34 Kālacakra (“wheel of time”) initiations he has conferred, from Lhasa in 1954 to Bodh Gaya in 2017. It took its most enduring root in Tibet, where it remains the dominant form of Buddhism, and across the Himalayas — including Bhutan and Nepal, the Buddha’s birthplace — and Mongolia.

The Four Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
Tibetan Buddhism is traditionally organised into four principal orders:
- Nyingma (“the Ancient Ones”) — the oldest order, reaching back to the 8th century and the figure of Padmasambhava (revered as Guru Rinpoche), who helped establish the Dharma there.
- Kagyu (“Oral Lineage”) — emerging in the 11th century, it traces its transmission through the Indian masters Tilopa and Nāropa to the Tibetan translator Marpa and the beloved poet-yogi Milarepa.
- Sakya (“Grey Earth”) — also rooted in the 11th century, named for the monastery founded in 1073, and known for its Path and Result (Lamdre) teachings and for scholars such as Sakya Paṇḍita (1182–1251).
- Gelug (“the Virtuous Tradition”) — the newest order, and the predominant one in Tibet since the 17th century, founded by the great reformer Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), who emphasised monastic discipline and rigorous study. The Dalai Lamas belong to this Gelug order.
A Word About “Hīnayāna”
You may encounter the term “Hīnayāna,” the “Lesser Vehicle,” used as if it named Theravāda. It is best avoided, for two reasons. First, it was coined by Mahāyāna followers as a polemical label, ranking their own “Great Vehicle” above the early schools — a name given them by their opponents, not one they chose. It carries a built-in put-down. Second, it is inaccurate to treat it as a synonym for Theravāda, though scholars differ on what it did name. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Britannica’s main Buddhism and Hīnayāna entries treat it as the Mahāyāna name for the early non-Mahāyāna schools as a group, of which Theravāda is one living descendant, not the lot. Jonathan Silk, in Britannica’s Mahāyāna entry, disagrees: the word was used “to criticize unacceptable and deviant opinions” and “is never equivalent to non-Mahayana Buddhism, much less to any specific sect such as the Theravada”. Many writers and scholars therefore speak of “Theravāda,” “the early Buddhist schools,” or “Nikāya Buddhism” instead. We follow that practice here, and gently encourage you to as well.
So Which Branch Is “Real” Buddhism?
It is natural to want to know which branch is the original, the purest, the true one. The honest answer is that the question slightly misframes things. Theravāda is the only surviving early non-Mahāyāna school, and it keeps the Pali canon, which scholars generally agree contains the earliest surviving record of the Buddha’s teachings; that gives its claim to the early teaching real weight. Yet Britannica notes that Theravāda, “like all other Buddhist schools”, claims to adhere most closely to the original teaching, and Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna do not regard themselves as departures from the Buddha’s teaching; they understand themselves as drawing out its deeper implications, and they trace their inspiration to him no less sincerely.
Better, then, to picture one tree with several great limbs, or several routes up a single mountain. Each branch shares the trunk — the Buddha, the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the aim of liberation — and each has shaped that inheritance into a distinct form of beauty and depth. To rank them is mostly to reveal where one is standing. To understand them is to see how a single profound insight into suffering and its end could flower into so many living traditions.
Finding Your Way In
If you are new to all this, you do not need to choose a branch before you begin. The shared core is more than enough to practise with for a long time, and most of what this site teaches — ethics, meditation, the Four Noble Truths, mindfulness — belongs to all the traditions alike. Many people find that one branch’s style simply resonates: the spare clarity of Theravāda insight practice, the expansive compassion of Mahāyāna, the rich symbolism of the Tibetan path, the directness of Zen, the devotion of Pure Land. That resonance is a fine guide. The branches are not walls; they are doors. If you are curious which one might suit your temperament, our Which Buddhist path fits you? quiz is a light-hearted place to start.
Several of these branches and movements have their own in-depth guides: our comparisons of Theravāda and Mahāyāna, Zen and Tibetan Buddhism and Theravāda and Zen, the devotional path of Pure Land, the modern movements of secular and engaged Buddhism, the story of how Buddhism took root in the West and of Buddhism in America in particular, where Buddhist practice goes back to some of the Chinese temples of the 1850s and today’s communities include Shin, Zen, Theravāda, Chinese and Vietnamese Mahāyāna, Tibetan and Nichiren Buddhists, all three vehicles side by side in one city-state in Buddhism in Singapore, and figures such as the Dalai Lama. To meet the teacher they all revere, see who the Buddha was; for the teaching they all share, the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path; and if you are just starting out, our guide to Buddhism basics is the gentlest way in.
Frequently asked questions
What are the main types of Buddhism?
Buddhism is usually divided into three major vehicles: Theravāda ('the Way of the Elders'), the only surviving non-Mahāyāna school, predominant in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia; Mahāyāna ('the Great Vehicle'), the East Asian family that includes Zen, Pure Land and Nichiren; and Vajrayāna ('the Diamond Vehicle'), the tantric Buddhism of Tibet and the Himalayas. All three share the Buddha, the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, differing mainly in texts, methods and emphasis.
What is the difference between Theravāda and Mahāyāna Buddhism?
Theravāda accepts the Pali canon as authoritative and holds up the arahant, liberated by one's own effort. Mahāyāna, which arose around the beginning of the Common Era, adds later sūtras and centres the bodhisattva, who seeks full buddhahood to liberate all beings; its texts cast the arahant's aim as release for oneself alone, a picture Theravāda does not accept. It also develops emptiness (śūnyatā) and a vast cosmology of buddhas and bodhisattvas.
Is Zen a separate religion from Buddhism?
No. Zen is a school of Mahāyāna Buddhism, not a separate religion. Its name comes, through Chinese Chan, from the Sanskrit dhyāna, meaning 'meditation' — which signals its emphasis on direct meditative insight over scriptural study alone. Zen began in China and became especially influential in Japan. It shares the same Buddhist foundations as every other school; what distinguishes it is its method and flavour, not a different faith.
Why shouldn't Theravāda be called 'Hinayana'?
'Hīnayāna' means 'Lesser Vehicle', a polemical label from Mahāyāna texts that ranks their own path above the early schools, which did not choose the name. It is widely regarded as derogatory, and inaccurate to equate with Theravāda, a living tradition descending from the early Buddhist schools. Many writers now prefer more neutral terms, such as 'Theravāda', 'the early Buddhist schools' or 'Nikāya Buddhism'.
Which branch of Buddhism is the original or 'true' one?
No one branch is the single 'true' Buddhism. Theravāda is the only surviving early non-Mahāyāna school and keeps the Pali canon, which scholars generally agree holds the earliest surviving record of the teaching; yet Britannica notes that every Buddhist school claims to adhere most closely to the Buddha's original teaching. Each tradition traces itself to the Buddha and shares his core teaching. They are branches of one tree rather than rival religions.
Sources
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Theravada' — for the Theravāda section
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Mahayana' (Jonathan A. Silk) — for the Mahāyāna section and the section on the term Hīnayāna
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Vajrayana' — for the Vajrayāna section
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Zen' — for the Zen (Chan) section
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Pure Land Buddhism' — for the Pure Land section
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Nichiren Buddhism' — for the Nichiren section
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Tibetan Buddhism' — for Vajrayāna in Tibet
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Hinayana' — for the section on the term Hīnayāna
- Buddhism (entry), Encyclopædia Britannica
- 'What is Theravada Buddhism?', Access to Insight (BCBS Edition, 2005, last revised 30 November 2013): Theravada 'the sole survivor of those early non-Mahayana schools'; one of the early schools 'eventually gave rise to a reform movement that called itself Mahayana'
- Ethics in Indian Buddhism (entry), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Charles Goodman and Aaron Schultz, rev. 2024): the Theravada 'the only surviving tradition of Buddhism that is not Mahāyāna'; Hīnayāna 'a pejorative term' in Mahāyāna texts, whose charge that the Disciples seek Nirvana 'for themselves alone' 'may be unfair' to 'the real Theravāda tradition'
- Bhikkhu Bodhi, 'Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas', Access to Insight (BCBS Edition): the arahant disciples did not 'just selfishly' reap the benefits of the path and do nothing for others
- Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (SN 56.11), 'Setting the Wheel of Dhamma in Motion' — for the shared core (Four Noble Truths, Noble Eightfold Path) — SuttaCentral; Access to Insight (trans. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu)
- Magga-vibhaṅga Sutta (SN 45.8), 'An Analysis of the Path' — for the Noble Eightfold Path — SuttaCentral; Access to Insight (trans. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu)
- Tibet at a Glance, edited and compiled by Dorjee Thinley (The Tibet Museum, Department of Information and International Relations, Central Tibetan Administration, Dharamsala; first edition 2005), section 'Tibetan Buddhism: The Four Schools' — the four schools; Nyingma tracing its origin to Padmasambhava in the eighth century, with Dzogchen as its instruction; Kagyu founded in the eleventh century by Marpa, a student of Naropa and the teacher of Milarepa; Sakya founded in the eleventh century by Khon Kunchog Gyalpo, its central teaching the Paths and Fruits, Sakya Pandita its most illustrious master; Gelug founded in the fourteenth century by Tsongkhapa, stressing monastic discipline and scholarship, grown to be the dominant school, its head the Gaden Throne Holder
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Dge-lugs-pa' — since the 17th century the predominant Buddhist order in Tibet and the sect of the Dalai and Panchen lamas; founded in the late 14th century by Tsong-kha-pa, who enforced strict monastic discipline and set a higher standard of learning for monks
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Tsong-kha-pa' — the Tibetan lama (1357–1419) who founded the Dge-lugs-pa (Gelug) to restore monastic discipline
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Rnying-ma-pa' — the Old Order, claiming to transmit the teachings of Padmasambhava, who visited Tibet in the 8th century
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Bka-brgyud-pa' — followers of the 11th-century translator Mar-pa, who studied in India under Naropa; his chief disciple Mi-la ras-pa (Milarepa), revered as the greatest poet-saint in Tibetan history
- 'The Ganges Mahāmudrā Instructions' by Tilopa, Lotsawa House (trans. Ina Bieler, 2017, revised 2021 and 2023) — its colophon: the instruction the siddha Tilopa gave Nāropa on the banks of the Ganges
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 'Sa-skya-pa' — named for the Sa-skya monastery founded in 1073; the lam-bras (path and result) teachings transmitted from India by the translator Brog-mi
- Alexander Berzin, 'Sakya Monasteries: Sakya', Study Buddhism (original version published in Chö-Yang, Year of Tibet Edition, Dharamsala, 1991) — that Sakya means literally gray earth, from the colour of the soil where Konchog Gyalpo founded the monastery in 1073
- Jonathan C. Gold, 'Sakya Paṇḍita', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (first published 1 December 2017) — his dates, 1182–1251, and his standing as the intellectual giant of the Sakya school, famous among Tibetans for his learning
- Ogyen Trinley Dorje, 'A Few Words on the Vast Activities of Gampopa, Founder of the Dakpo Kagyu, on the Anniversary of his Parinirvana', talk at The Mar Ngok Summer Teachings 2024 (19 August 2024), Karmapa: The Official Website of the 17th Karmapa (Ogyen Trinley Dorje) — on the name Kagyu: in its broad sense ka is the words of the Buddha and gyu a lineage passed down from one person to the next, a sense he says would fit anyone who upholds a Buddhist lineage; as the name is generally understood nowadays, the lineage of the four oral transmissions that Tilopa received, passed through Naropa to Marpa
- 'Introduction to the Kalachakra' (trans. and ed. John Newman), with the list 'Kalachakra Initiations by His Holiness the Dalai Lama' (34 initiations, May 1954 to January 2017), Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama
- 'First Day of the Kalachakra Empowerment - Entry into the Mandala', Bodhgaya, 11 January 2017, Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama
- 'Tibetan Buddhism', glossary entry, Project Himalayan Art, Rubin Museum of Art — Tibetan Buddhism 'is practiced in Tibet, Mongolia, Bhutan, Ladakh, and among certain groups in Nepal, China, and Russia'
- Meir Shahar, 'Epigraphy, Buddhist Historiography, and Fighting Monks: The Case of the Shaolin Monastery', Asia Major 3rd ser. 13.2 (2000): 15-36 — Shaolin on the slopes of Mount Song, established in the late fifth century; the legend of Bodhidharma's nine years in a cave above it; the Tang stele recording the monks' fighting
- The White Lotus of the Good Dharma (Lotus Sutra, Toh 113), trans. Peter Alan Roberts, 84000 — glossary entry 'bodhisattva': bodhisattvas 'purposely opt to remain within cyclic existence in order to liberate all sentient beings'
Corrections & updates
- — We had said the Nyingma order reaches back to the 8th-century arrival of Buddhism in Tibet. Buddhism reached Tibet in the 7th century, under King Songtsen Gampo; the 8th century is when Padmasambhava, from whom the Nyingma traces itself, came to Tibet. The entry now ties the Nyingma to Padmasambhava's coming in the 8th century instead. The four orders are now cited to Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Central Tibetan Administration, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Alexander Berzin, and the Kagyu also to two of its own teachers, Tilopa and Ogyen Trinley Dorje.
- — We said the arahant 'aims at their own liberation' while the bodhisattva postpones 'final rest until everyone can be freed'. The first is a Mahāyāna polemic that Theravāda rejects, and the second oversimplifies. The paragraph now quotes 84000's gloss, attributes the contrast, and links the fuller discussion.
- — We called Theravāda 'the oldest surviving school' and 'the most historically conservative branch', said this gave it 'a real claim to historical priority', and described each later branch as carrying the earlier teaching forward. Our sources call Theravāda the only surviving early non-Mahāyāna school, and scholars differ on whether Mahāyāna is a later successor and on what Hīnayāna named. The page now gives both views, and an FAQ answer now attributes the 'oneself alone' picture of the arahant to Mahāyāna texts.