The Tibetan Book of the Dead (Bardo Thödol)

By Tim Yu, Founder & Editor · Published 3 June 2026 · Updated 9 September 2026

Checked against the primary texts · How we check · Report a correction

The Tibetan Book of the Dead is among the most famous Buddhist texts in the West — and one of the most misunderstood. Its real Tibetan name, Bardo Thödol, means “Liberation Through Hearing During the Intermediate State,” and that is closer to its purpose: not a morbid catalogue of death, but a practical guide read aloud to the dying and the dead, mapping the strange territory between one life and the next and pointing the traveller, at every step, toward freedom.

What the Tibetan Book of the Dead really is

The text belongs to the Tibetan Buddhist tradition — specifically the Nyingma, its oldest school — and it is a guide to the bardos (Tibetan bar do, “intermediate state”): the stretches of experience that, in this tradition, lie between death and rebirth. According to its teaching, the period after death is not blank but vividly alive — a sequence of states in which the mind, freed from the body, meets reality and its own projections with extraordinary intensity. The Bardo Thödol is a map of that journey, written to be read to the traveller as they make it. For how it relates to the rest of the Buddhist scriptures, including the canonical texts it draws on, see the scriptures overview.

The familiar Western title is a later invention — and so, in part, is the book. What Oxford University Press published in 1927 was The Tibetan Book of the Dead, or, as its title page goes on, The After-Death Experiences on the Bardo Plane, according to Lāma Kazi Dawa-Samdup’s English Rendering. The English was Dawa-Samdup’s; the title, the framing and the annotation were Walter Evans-Wentz’s, and he chose that title as a deliberate echo of the then-popular Egyptian Book of the Dead. The label stuck — but it lends a graveyard gloom to a text that is, at heart, about liberation, and it quietly promotes one part of one Nyingma treasure cycle into the Buddhist book about death.

It is not that. The Bardo Thödol sits inside a cycle that Lotsawa House catalogues as the “Profound Dharma of the Peaceful and Wrathful Deities of Self-Liberated Wisdom Mind,” commonly called Karling Zhitro and described there as the “source of the Bardo Tödrol … or ‘Tibetan Book of the Dead’, revealed by Karma Lingpa.” Donald Lopez’s history of the volume for Princeton University Press puts the Western misreading at its bluntest: The Tibetan Book of the Dead, he writes, “is not really Tibetan, it is not really a book, and it is not really about death.” Other Buddhist traditions describe the passage between lives quite differently, or deny that there is one — see what happens after death in Buddhism.

Where the Tibetan Book of the Dead came from

By tradition, the Bardo Thödol is a terma — a “hidden treasure.” Tibetan Buddhism holds that the great 8th-century master Padmasambhava, who established tantric Buddhism in Tibet, composed many teachings and concealed them — in rocks, lakes, and the minds of future disciples — to be discovered in later ages when they would be most needed. The Bardo Thödol is said to have been written down by his student Yeshe Tsogyal, hidden in the hills of central Tibet, and revealed centuries later by the 14th-century treasure-finder (tertön) Karma Lingpa (1326–1386). It forms part of a larger cycle of teachings on the “peaceful and wrathful deities.”

The Three Bardos

What made the text famous is its map of the after-death journey through three great stages. Those three are a selection, not the whole scheme: the cycle counts six bardos, and the text names all six to the dead person before telling them which three lie ahead. Both passages are quoted in full below.

1. The bardo of the moment of death. As the body’s processes dissolve, the tradition says, the “clear light of reality” — the pure, luminous nature of mind itself — dawns with overwhelming brilliance. For one who recognises it, this is the supreme opportunity: to merge with that reality is liberation. The text urges the dying person, again and again, simply to recognise the light as their own true nature and rest in it.

2. The bardo of reality. For those who do not recognise the clear light, a second stage unfolds: a procession of vivid visions, first of radiant peaceful deities, then of terrifying wrathful ones. The text’s crucial instruction is that these apparitions, beautiful or horrifying, are not external — they are projections of the perceiver’s own mind. To recognise them as such is, again, to be liberated. To flee them in terror is to be driven onward.

3. The bardo of becoming. If liberation is still not found, the consciousness, pulled by the momentum of its own karma, drifts toward a new birth among the six realms. Here the text offers more modest guidance: how to steer toward a fortunate rebirth rather than an unfortunate one.

The text’s own words: the six bardos

The plainest way into the Bardo Thödol is the passage the officiant reads before any of the visions arrive. It is a count, spoken to the dead person by name, and it gives six intermediate states rather than three.

Three of the six — womb, dream, meditation — are lived through, not died through. The three the dying person is told to expect are the three this book maps in detail, and they are the three that Western summaries usually mean by “the bardos.” Lotsawa House, which catalogues the translated pieces of the Karling Zhitro cycle, lists the same six under the names most modern translations use: the bardo of this life, of dreams, of samādhi meditation, of dying, of dharmatā, and of becoming.

The cycle also states those six in the first person, as vows, in a short text called the Root Verses on the Six Bardos — which Lotsawa House calls “one of the most famous sections of Liberation Upon Hearing in the Bardo,” and which the 1927 volume prints complete in its appendix. It opens not with death but with wasting a life.

“Listening, reflecting, and meditating” is the ordinary Tibetan curriculum, not an esoteric practice, and the verse asks that the Tri-Kāya — the three “bodies” of a buddha — be realised through it now, while there is a human body to do it with. Putting this first makes the structural claim of the whole cycle: what the later verses demand is a skill you either rehearse in life or meet cold.

The next two verses stay in life as well — the dream bardo, where the sleeper is told to abandon “the inordinate corpse-like sleeping of the sleep of stupidity,” and the dhyāna bardo, meditative absorption itself. Only with the fourth does the text arrive at death.

Notice what the verse asks for. Not that the teachings be learned now, but that the speaker already be steady in them: a footnote offers the alternative reading “May I enter into the bright space of undistractedness [and enlightening] teachings.” It is a vow made in advance by someone who expects to need it, which is why Tibetan practitioners rehearse these verses long before they are dying. On the practical side of accompanying someone through that, see caring for the dying.

Everything turns on one verb: recognize. “The Bardo of the Reality” is this edition’s name for what modern translations call the bardo of dharmatā; the 1927 footnotes give the Tibetan as Chös-nyid Bardo and gloss it “‘Intermediate State’, or ‘State of Uncertainty, [during the experiencing] of Reality’.” The vision-filled bardo is named after reality itself, which is the tradition’s way of saying the apparitions are not an interlude of hallucination between real states. The instruction is not that they are unreal but that they are yours. Minling Terchen Gyurme Dorje’s own bardo manual gives the confidence this asks for an image: trusting that appearances are mind’s own manifestation in the bardo of dharmatā is, he writes, “likened to a child entering its mother’s lap” (trans. Adam Pearcey, Lotsawa House, CC BY-NC 4.0).

The register drops from liberation to damage control, and “the womb-door” is meant literally. At this stage, the 1927 edition says, “thou wilt see visions of males and females in union,” and the instruction is to “withhold thyself from going between them,” regarding “the father and mother as thy Guru and the Divine Mother” — the “Guru, the Father-Mother” the verse’s last line names. There are five such methods of closing in all, and then, for those they did not save, a section headed “The Choosing of the Womb-Door”: “if the womb-door hath not been closed, it is almost time to assume a body.” This is the stage where guidance becomes steering rather than liberation — toward a fortunate rebirth among the six realms rather than an unfortunate one.

How the Tibetan Book of the Dead is used

The Bardo Thödol is not a book to be read silently for information; it is a liturgy for the dying. A lama or a knowledgeable companion reads it aloud — to the person as they die, and then beside the body over the following days (traditionally up to forty-nine) — speaking directly to the consciousness, naming what it is experiencing, and coaching it through each stage. It is, in the most literal sense, a guide spoken into the ear of someone on a journey, by someone who knows the road.

What that sounds like can be read rather than imagined. Every instruction is in the second person, addressed to someone assumed to be present, listening and confused; the officiant is told to “Call the deceased by name” first.

The forty-nine days are the text’s own instruction, and it gives its own reason for them: repetition.

Where the number itself comes from is spelled out in the later bardo literature. Minling Terchen Gyurme Dorje (1646–1714), the treasure-revealer who founded Mindroling Monastery, wrote his own guidance for the dead under the same title, Liberation Upon Hearing. It describes the consciousness in the bardo of becoming dying and being reborn every seven days until it finds a body, “for a maximum of forty-nine days in total, within which one will find the conditions for rebirth” (trans. Adam Pearcey, Lotsawa House, CC BY-NC 4.0). That is the window Tibetan families sponsor ceremonies through; see Buddhist funerals for what the living do during it.

And then the claim hidden in the name. Evans-Wentz’s introduction renders the Tibetan title Bardo Thödol as “Liberation by Hearing on the After-Death Plane,” and the text means that as a mechanism, not a description.

That is why the same page directs that it “should be read over the pillows of all persons who are ill; it should be read at the side of all corpses” — and why it is read aloud to someone who can no longer read.

How the translations differ

The 1927 rendering is the one most Western readers have met, and it is the one to handle with care. It was made in Gangtok, Sikkim: Kazi Dawa-Samdup completed and revised the translation during 1919, the work with Evans-Wentz finished in 1920, and the Lama died on 22 March 1922 — five years before the book appeared under a title he never gave it. Evans-Wentz says as much himself, in the introduction he wrote for it. No more competent scholar to render the text was likely to arise again in that century, he writes, “than the late Lāma Kazi Dawa-Samdup, the actual translator”; and, writing of himself in the third person as the editor, he concedes that “his knowledge of Tibetan was almost as nothing.”

What that produced, Donald Lopez argues in his history of the book, is a volume “much more American than Tibetan, owing a greater debt to Theosophy and Madame Blavatsky than to the lamas of the Land of Snows.” The vocabulary shows it — a “Bardo Plane,” capitalised abstractions, an English pitched somewhere between the King James Bible and the seance room. It is still worth reading, it is public domain in the United States, and it should be read as a period document rather than as the text. Here is its most famous moment, the instruction spoken at the point of death.

Two words repay attention, and the edition’s own footnotes supply both. “The All-Good” is not an adjective but a name: the footnote gives the Tibetan as Chös-nyid Kün-tu-bzang-po and the Sanskrit as Dharma-Dhātu Samanta-Bhadra, “the embodiment of the Dharma-Kāya, the first state of Buddhahood.” And “intellect” renders Shes-rig, which the same page calls “the intellect, the knowing or cognizing faculty” — while the note overleaf concedes that rig-pa and shes-rig are “Ordinarily … synonymous”, and that the two have been rendered now as “consciousness” and “intellect”, “or else, to suit the context,” as “consciousness” and “consciousness of phenomena”. A word the translators themselves flagged as unstable is not a safe place to build a doctrine.

The same footnotes are frank about something else: this English translates one manuscript. Where the block-print copy differs, the notes say so — at the clear-light passage, “Our Block-Print text, in error here, gives for the All-Good … Kuntu-Zang-mo, which means ‘All-Good Mother’.” A reading in this volume is a reading of the manuscript Kazi Dawa-Samdup worked from, not of “the Bardo Thödol” flat.

The sharpest way to see what a translation decides is one line, three times. This is the closing line of the root verse of the bardo of dharmatā — twice from the 1927 volume, which prints that verse in two places in different English, and once from Lotsawa House.

The Tibetan behind all three is the same word, and the 1927 footnote to the Book I line says so: “Text: rang-snang (pron. rang-nang): ‘one’s own [mental] visions (or thought-forms).’” Render it “thought-forms” and the visions become mental contents — and a text about mental contents can be read as psychology, which is much of what happened to this book in the West. Princeton University Press’s description of Lopez’s study sums up that afterlife: “Carl Jung wrote a commentary on it, Timothy Leary redesigned it as a guidebook for an acid trip, and the Beatles quoted Leary’s version in their song ‘Tomorrow Never Knows.’” Render rang snang instead as “natural manifestations” — the natural display of awareness — and the appearances are not a demotion of reality but the highest thing a Dzogchen text could say about them.

Two cautions before treating the modern wording as the verdict. Adam Pearcey’s translation is dated 2016 and was made, by his own note, “with reference to earlier versions, especially that of Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche and Francesca Freemantle” — so it is not an independent witness against 1927. And two complete modern translations exist that this page does not quote at all: Francesca Fremantle and Chögyam Trungpa’s The Tibetan Book of the Dead: The Great Liberation Through Hearing in the Bardo (Shambhala, 1975), and Gyurme Dorje’s first complete translation for Penguin Classics, edited by Graham Coleman with Thupten Jinpa and introduced by the Dalai Lama, which carries far more of the cycle than the 1927 selection did. Both are in copyright and are not reproduced here; the 1927 rendering is out of copyright in the United States, and the Lotsawa House translations are used in short excerpt under their Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 licence. If you want the whole text in modern English, those two are what to buy.

The Deeper Teaching

Beneath the vivid imagery lies a profound and characteristically Buddhist point: that what we meet after death is what we meet in life — our own mind, projected. The peaceful and wrathful deities are not gods waiting beyond the grave but the energies of our own consciousness, met without the buffer of the body. Seen this way, the Bardo Thödol is not really about the afterlife at all; it is about the nature of mind, and about the one skill that liberates in death exactly as in life: to recognise appearances as mind, and not be ruled by them. This is why Tibetan practitioners study it while living — for the bardos of death are said only to magnify the bardo of this very moment.

Where to read the text itself

We are not the last stop. Lotsawa House publishes the Root Verses on the Six Bardos in full, with the Tibetan and a phonetic transcription set line by line against Adam Pearcey’s English, and Minling Terchen’s Liberation Upon Hearing, which is the closest thing freely online to what is actually read beside a body. Longchenpa’s Crucial Advice: A Complete Set of Instructions for the Bardos gives the same map from a Dzogchen master’s hand. The translated pieces of Karma Lingpa’s cycle are gathered in Lotsawa House’s Karling Zhitro collection, where several carry a restriction notice, since Vajrayāna practice texts are meant for those who have received the transmission. The 1927 Evans-Wentz edition is scanned complete at the Internet Archive — read it with the cautions above in hand. Every Lotsawa House translation quoted or linked on this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0, and is used here only in short excerpt.

A Note on Death and Grief

It is worth saying plainly: this is a text about dying, and reading about it can stir real feelings — fear of our own death, or grief for someone we have lost. The tradition offers it not to frighten but to console and prepare, holding that death, met with awareness, can be a doorway rather than only an ending. If you are grieving or frightened, be gentle with yourself; our reflections on grief and on what Buddhism says happens after death may be a kinder place to begin, and real support from people who love you matters more than any text.

For the tradition that produced it, see Tibetan Buddhism; for the master to whom it is attributed, Padmasambhava; for the practical work of accompanying someone through their final days, caring for the dying; and for another of the world’s great Buddhist scriptures, the Lotus Sutra.