The Bhaddekaratta Sutta: This Present Moment

By Tim Yu, Founder & Editor · Published 7 September 2026

Checked against the primary texts · How we check · Report a correction

The Bhaddekaratta Sutta is discourse 131 of the Majjhima Nikāya: four short verses telling a meditator not to run back to the past or anticipate the future, followed by the Buddha’s own line-by-line analysis of them. This page gives the verse in full, its exposition, and why its title defeats translators.

What is the Bhaddekaratta Sutta?

MN 131 belongs to the Majjhima Nikāya, the middle-length collection of the Pāli Canon, and is barely a page long. It has no plot: no questioner, no crisis, no simile. The Buddha announces a teaching, recites a verse, takes it apart, recites it again.

The whole setting: Jeta’s Grove at Sāvatthī, and an audience of bhikkhus — monastics, rendered “mendicants” by Bhikkhu Sujato and “monks” by Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu. Nobody asks for this teaching. The three discourses that follow all supply an occasion — a question, a puzzled monk, a visiting deity; this one does not.

The Pali names the two halves: uddesa and vibhaṅga, which Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi render “summary and exposition”. It is a standard canonical form — a terse mnemonic verse first, its unpacking second — which is why the verse is recited twice, before and after the analysis. Sujato notes that the same verse is explained on three further occasions, in MN 132–134.

The Bhaddekaratta verse, in full

Sujato’s “run back to” carries the force of nānvāgameyya: going after the past, not merely remembering it. Bodhi’s endnote gives the same phrase as the more literal reading of the line his verse renders “revive the past”. This is not advice about rumination in the modern sense: Sujato’s note points to SN 22.79, which makes clear that “in the past” means in a past life. The verse opens on the scale of rebirth, not of yesterday’s argument.

Here is the verb insight meditation is named after: vipassati, which Sujato renders “clearly discern” rather than “see with insight”. “Phenomenon” is dhamma, which he glosses as anything directly knowable; tattha tattha he renders “in every case”. His note adds that asaṁhīraṁ asaṅkuppaṁ is the object of the verb rather than an adverb, and that the phrase names Nibbāna at Snp 5.19.

Ātappa is ardour: the Pali of the first line reads kiccam ātappaṁ, the work of ardour, and the root returns in the last verse as ātāpī, the one who keenly meditates. The bargain is saṅgara, a compact; the one who will not strike it is maccu, death, with mahāsena, a great army. Note who is not named: Māra appears nowhere in this discourse’s Pali. The urgency is plain mortality, which is why the verse is at home in Buddhist reflection on death.

Ahorattaṁ atanditaṁ — “tireless all night and day” — decides the title argument below, because the verse itself covers the full twenty-four hours. The ending is odd for a discourse the Buddha is giving: “the peaceful sage”, santo muni, is the Buddha, as Sujato notes, so the verse quotes him in the third person.

What the Buddha meant by “running back to the past”

The analysis takes the verse’s three time-words in turn, and defines each narrowly.

The Pali is tattha nandiṁ samanvāneti: you gather up nandi, delight, in that. Sujato notes that samanvāneti is unique in early Pali and that “muster” carries both senses, bringing together and arousing. The five items — form, feeling, perception, choice, consciousness — are the five aggregates, though khandha is never used here. The fault is not the memory; it is the relish attached to a self assembled out of it.

The same sentence with the tense turned round, and the same verb. Sujato is careful about the scope of paṭikaṅkhe, “anticipate”: it is not always a fault, he notes, since a mendicant ought to anticipate dangers (AN 4.122) and an arahant “awaits their time” (SN 2.29). What is ruled out is the wish may I be such a one, not forethought.

This is the surprise of the discourse. “Faltering amid presently arisen phenomena” — saṁhīrati, the verb behind the verse’s asaṁhīraṁ — has nothing to do with attention wandering. It is defined as the twenty modes of self-view, four for each aggregate. Being unfaltering in the present, in MN 131, means not building a self out of what is present.

How the translations differ

Almost every line has been Englished four different ways:

Two rows change what the verse asks of you. In the third, vipassati is the verb behind vipassanā: Ñāṇamoli, Bodhi and Ñāṇananda all put the noun “insight” into the line, so it reads as prescribing a named method, while Sujato’s “clearly discern” and Ṭhānissaro’s doubled “right there, right there” keep it a plain instruction to see. In the fourth, Sujato and Ñāṇananda make asaṁhīraṁ asaṅkuppaṁ a thing you know and foster — Sujato ties the phrase to Nibbāna elsewhere in the canon — while Bodhi’s adverbs make it the manner of knowing. One reading has you cultivating the deathless; the other, practising steadily.

Why the title is so hard to translate

Bhaddekaratta joins bhadda (good, auspicious) and eka (one) to ratta, and ratta is the problem. Bhikkhu Bodhi’s endnote sets out why: ratta and ratti can represent either the Sanskrit for night or the Sanskrit for attachment. Ñāṇamoli took the second sense, and their first edition read “one fortunate attachment”; Bodhi changed it to “a single excellent night” at Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu’s suggestion, reasoning that neither the commentary nor the subcommentary glosses ratta — which they surely would have, had it meant attachment — and that the Central Asian Sanskrit version, the Sanskrit title heading the Tibetan version, and the Tibetan translation itself all read bhadrakarātri, night. He credits Peter Skilling for that, and adds that the compound occurs nowhere in the Pali Canon outside MN 131–134 — there is no second passage to test it against.

The other renderings come out of the same ambiguity. Ṭhānissaro’s introduction records that I. B. Horner dropped ratta from her title altogether and that Ñāṇananda, taking his cue from Ñāṇamoli, read it as “lover”, yielding The Ideal Lover of Solitude. Ṭhānissaro accepts “night” and then rejects the English: Pali habitually counts a twenty-four-hour span as a “night”, as a lunar calendar would, and since the verse has the practitioner tireless “both day & night”, he writes An Auspicious Day.

They disagree about the phrase’s origin, too. Ṭhānissaro’s introduction treats bhaddekaratta as a pre-Buddhist expression the Buddha adopted and re-read, so that an auspicious day is made by your own attitude to time rather than by omens; Bodhi’s endnote quotes a manuscript note in which Ñāṇamoli concludes the opposite, that the term was more likely coined by the Buddha himself.

Does MN 131 teach “live in the present moment”?

Partly, and not in the way it is usually quoted. This is the canonical verse most often reached for when “be here now” is called Buddhist, and the exposition puts three limits on that reading. The past it forbids returning to is a past life, on Sujato’s reading of the parallel at SN 22.79. The fault in both directions is nandi, delight — a self relished in memory or wished for in prospect — not thinking about time; Sujato is explicit that anticipating is not always wrong. And presence is defined as not-self rather than as attention: the word sati does not appear in this discourse’s Pali at all.

What the text does license is sharper than the slogan: the present is where anything can be discerned clearly, and the reason for urgency is death rather than enjoyment — impermanence joined to urgency. What the practice consists of belongs to mindfulness and vipassanā; MN 131 supplies the words underneath them.

Where the same verse turns up again

MN 131 opens a set of four. In MN 132 Ānanda recites and expounds the same verses and the Buddha approves. In MN 133 Mahākaccāna expounds them through the six senses rather than the five aggregates — running back to the past becomes consciousness tied up with desire for the eye and sights it once had — and the Buddha says he would have answered “in exactly the same way as Mahākaccāna” (MN 133:21.2, trans. Bhikkhu Sujato). In MN 134 a deity urges a monk who does not know the verses to learn them.

Read the whole discourse

The discourse is short enough to read in one sitting, so read it: Bhikkhu Sujato’s on SuttaCentral, public domain (CC0), or compare Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu’s and Bhikkhu Ñāṇananda’s on Access to Insight. For the collection this sutta sits in, see Buddhist scriptures; read it alongside the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta and the Ānāpānasati Sutta; and for living with the verse, embracing impermanence.