e‑Buddhism.com

Buddha Quotes on Love: 17 Real Lines, With Sources

Buddha Quotes on Love: a single lotus on calm water (ink-wash illustration)
Illustration: AI-generated ink-wash art for e-Buddhism.com · how we use AI

The Buddha did not teach one thing called love. He taught mettā (goodwill), karuṇā (compassion) and muditā (gladness at another’s gladness) as qualities to extend to every being without exception — and he treated pema and piya, fond attachment to one particular person, as a source of sorrow and fear. English collapses all of that into a single word.

That is why “Buddha quotes on love” pages read as though he contradicted himself. He didn’t; the translators had seven Pali words and one English one. Below are seventeen lines from the discourses, with three more that sibling pages print in full, each with its reference, its translator and a link you can check. Where a verse has its own deep page here, it is linked rather than re-argued.

The seven Pali words English hides behind “love”

Most of the quotations below come from Bhikkhu Sujato’s SuttaCentral translations, which are dedicated to the public domain, so we can print whole verses rather than fragments. He renders mettā simply as love — his title for the Karaṇīya Metta Sutta is The Discourse on Love — which keeps the vocabulary honest: when he writes “love” for mettā, the Pali really is mettā.

PaliHow Sujato renders itWhat it actually namesWhere the word occurs below
mettālovegoodwill wished to all beings, without exception or conditionsSnp 1.8, Iti 27, AN 11.15, MN 7, SN 47.19
karuṇācompassionthe wish that suffering easeMN 7
muditārejoicinggladness at someone else’s good fortuneMN 7
upekkhāequanimitythe steadiness that keeps the other three from tipping overMN 7
anukampāsympathythe motive for bothering to teach at allSN 4.5
piyadear, what we hold dear — and, in AN 11.15, Dhp 130 and Dhp 211 below, plain “love”one particular person or thing, held closeDhp 130, Dhp 210–212, MN 87, SN 3.8, AN 11.15, AN 4.55
pemaattachmentfond attachment to that personDhp 213

Read that last column strictly: it lists only the passages where the Pali word is actually in the root text. A verse can belong to a theme without carrying the word. Dhammapada 5 and Dhammapada 197 are both in the mettā section below, and neither contains mettā — the Pali of the first is averena, “by non-hatred”, and of the second averino, “free of hate”. And the piya row is the awkward one for any quote page, including this one: Sujato himself reaches for the English word “love” to render piya five times in the passages printed below — twice in AN 11.15 (“Humans love you”, “Non-humans love you”), once in Dhp 130 (“all love life”), once in Dhp 211 (“those you love”). The seven words do not map cleanly onto one English word, which is the whole problem.

The first four are the four brahmavihāras, the “divine abidings”. The last two are not on that list, and the difference is the whole argument of this page. See also our guide to love vs attachment in Buddhism, which works the distinction out in practice.

Mettā: the love the Buddha told you to cultivate

Even as a mother would protect with her life her child, her only child, so too for all creatures unfold a boundless heart.
Karaṇīya Metta Sutta verse 7 (Snp 1.8) trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The most quoted line on any love page, and the most often clipped. The simile is not “love everyone like your mother loves you” — it is a comparison of intensity, borrowed from the fiercest instance of caring anyone in that audience would know, and then aimed at creatures generally. The Pali bhāvaye aparimāṇaṁ is a verb of cultivation: something you train, not something you feel. Its own page: Even as a mother protects her only child.

With love for the whole world, unfold a boundless heart: above, below, all round, unconstricted, without enmity or foe.
Karaṇīya Metta Sutta verse 8 (Snp 1.8) trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The next verse turns the mother image into a direction-by-direction exercise, which is how mettā meditation is still taught. “Unconstricted” translates asambādhaṁ: not narrowed, not fenced. Note what is missing — no object, no beloved, no exception clause. This is the verse where mettā itself appears (mettañca sabbalokasmi), not the mother verse before it. The whole Metta Sutta is on its own page, as is the collection that holds it, the Sutta Nipāta; this verse has a page too, at Radiating kindness over the entire world.

Mendicants, of all the grounds for making worldly merit, none are worth a sixteenth part of the heart’s release by love.
Itivuttaka 27 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

This is the Buddha’s highest claim for mettā, and it is a ranking, not a compliment. “The heart’s release by love” is mettā cetovimutti — love developed far enough to become a state of freedom, not a mood. The discourse then gives the ratio three images in a row: the stars against the moon, the autumn sun “rising to the firmament, having dispelled all the darkness of space”, and the morning star at the crack of dawn. Its Pali title is Mettābhāvanā Sutta: not “the discourse on love” but “the discourse on developing love”.

Don’t kill or cause others to kill, don’t conquer or encourage others to conquer, with love for all living creatures—you’ll have no enmity for anyone.
Itivuttaka 27, closing verse trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The same discourse ends in verse, and the verse is where the abstraction lands. Mettaṁso sabbabhūtesu — having a share of love towards all beings — is placed immediately after two prohibitions, killing and conquering, and immediately before a result, veraṁ tassa na kenacī: no enmity with anyone. The sixteenth-part claim above is a valuation; this is the behaviour it is a valuation of.

You sleep at ease. You wake happily. You don’t have bad dreams. Humans love you. Non-humans love you. Deities protect you. You can’t be harmed by fire, poison, or blade. Your mind quickly enters immersion. Your face is clear and bright. You don’t feel lost when you die. If you don’t penetrate any higher, you’ll be reborn in a realm of divinity.
Aṅguttara Nikāya AN 11.15 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Eleven benefits, listed flatly, most of them physical and domestic. This is the Buddha selling mettā to people who have to get up in the morning — you sleep better, your face is clearer, you are easier to be around. It is worth quoting in full precisely because it is unromantic. The last two items belong to a cosmology not every reader shares; the first four do not. And note the vocabulary trap sitting inside the list: “Humans love you” translates manussānaṁ piyo hotipiya, the word this page keeps setting against mettā. Cultivate mettā and you become piya to others. Even Sujato’s careful English cannot keep the two apart here.

Dhammapada 197 — “let us live with love”, averino, among the hostile — opens the Sukhavagga, the Dhammapada’s chapter on happiness, and Buddha quotes on happiness prints it there in full with its two companions, so we will not set it out twice. The grammar is first-person plural and hortatory — let us — which is rare in these verses and makes it sound like something a community said to itself. The Pali is not mettā but averino, “free of hate”, the same negative construction as verse 5 below: what is described is a way of living among hostile people without taking on their hostility. Its point is positional. It does not ask the hostile to stop, and it does not ask you to leave.

Verse 5 is the most-shared “Buddha quote on love” in English, usually printed with no reference at all. The Pali is averena, “by non-hatred” — Sujato names the positive quality, Acharya Buddharakkhita and Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu keep the negative form. So the verse says less than the English suggests and more than a slogan: hatred’s opposite is the only thing that ends it. Sujato’s wording is printed at Buddha quotes on anger, which carries this verse for the collections; the full treatment is at Hatred is never appeased by hatred.

The limit case is on that anger page too, so we will not print it twice. In the Simile of the Saw (MN 21:20.1) the Buddha says that even if bandits were severing you limb from limb, anyone who responded with a malevolent thought would not be following his instructions — and the training he attaches to it is to keep “a heart of love and no secret hate”, mettacittā. One thing is worth correcting here, because love-quote pages routinely get it wrong: the discourse is not addressed to monastics who had been complaining about being spoken to sharply. Its occasion (MN 21:2.1–2.5) is Phagguna of the Top-Knot, who was “spending too long mixing closely with some nuns” and who “got angry and upset, and even instigated disciplinary proceedings” whenever a fellow monastic criticised them. The saw arrives much later, after a list of five ways others may speak to you — timely or untimely, true or false, gentle or harsh, beneficial or harmful, “from a heart of love or from secret hate”.

Karuṇā: compassion, and why he bothered to teach

All tremble at the rod, all love life. Treating others like oneself, neither kill nor incite to kill.
Dhammapada verse 130 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Compassion here is not a feeling but an inference. Everyone flinches; you flinch; therefore. “Treating others like oneself” renders attānaṁ upamaṁ katvā, “having made oneself the comparison” — the canon’s version of the golden rule, argued from shared vulnerability rather than from divine command. The preceding verse, 129, is identical but for “all fear death”. The word karuṇā is not in either of them: what “all love life” translates is sabbesaṁ jīvitaṁ piyaṁ, life is piya, dear, to everyone. The verse that grounds non-harming runs on the very word this page keeps setting against mettā — which is the honest shape of the canon’s position. Piya is not a vice. It is simply the place where sorrow gets in, and here it is the place where fellow-feeling gets in too.

Wander forth, mendicants, for the welfare and happiness of the people, out of sympathy for the world, for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of gods and humans.
Māra's Snares SN 4.5 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The instruction that started the mission — given, in this telling, at the deer park at Isipatana, just before Māra turns up to tell the Buddha he is still caught. SN 4.5 supplies no headcount; the Vinaya’s parallel does. Immediately before the same instruction, it reports that “there were sixty-one perfected ones in the world” (pli-tv-kd1:10.4.8, trans. Bhikkhu Brahmali) — the Buddha and sixty others, which is the sixty who were sent out. “Out of sympathy for the world” translates lokānukampāya, from anukampā; Brahmali gives the identical Pali as “out of compassion for the world”. It names the motive rather than the feeling: not that the teacher pities you, but that there is no other reason to have gone anywhere.

Muditā: gladness at someone else’s good fortune

They meditate spreading a heart full of rejoicing to one direction, and to the second, and to the third, and to the fourth. In the same way above, below, across, everywhere, all around, they spread a heart full of rejoicing to the whole world—abundant, expansive, limitless, free of enmity and ill will.
Vatthūpama Sutta MN 7:15.1 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Here is an honest thing no quote page says: there is almost no stand-alone muditā quotation to give you. The Buddha defines it in this repeating formula and little else. Sujato writes the sentence out four times in MN 7, at 13.1, 14.1, 15.1 and 16.1, with mettā, karuṇā, muditā and upekkhā swapped in and nothing else changed; the Pali is even blunter about it, abbreviating the middle two with …pe…, the canon’s ditto mark. That repetition is the teaching: the four are one exercise in four directions of feeling. The Mahāyāna line most people quote for muditā is not the Buddha’s but Śāntideva’s, at all the joy the world contains.

The love verses almost nobody quotes

Chapter 16 of the Dhammapada is titled Piyavagga — Sujato gives it as “The Beloved”. Verses 212 to 216 run the same four-line frame five times over, changing a single word each time: piya (dear), pema (attachment), rati (relishing), kāma (desire), taṇhā (craving). Each time the frame says sorrow and fear spring from it and that one free of it has neither. Verses 209 to 211 set that frame up. These are the verses that get quietly dropped from love collections.

Don’t ever get too close to those you like or dislike. For not seeing the liked is suffering, and so is seeing the disliked.
Dhammapada verse 210 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The symmetry is stated before the conclusion is drawn. Piya and appiya, the liked and the disliked, are named in one breath and given one diagnosis: both bind, because both make your peace depend on someone’s whereabouts. Note that the verse does not say the liked person is a problem. It says the arrangement is.

Therefore don’t hold anything dear, for it’s bad to lose those you love. No ties are found in they who hold nothing loved or loathed.
Dhammapada verse 211 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The starkest line on this page, and the therefore at its front is load-bearing: it is the conclusion of verse 210, not a free-standing command. It is not counselling coldness toward one person while clinging to another; it is describing a mind that has stopped sorting the world into keep and discard. The Pali of the last line is yesaṁ natthi piyāppiyaṁ — the loved-and-loathed, one compound word, rejected as a pair.

Sorrow springs from what we hold dear, fear springs from what we hold dear; one free from holding anything dear has no sorrow, let alone fear.
Dhammapada verse 212 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Piyato jāyatī soko. The word is piya, not mettā — which is exactly why this verse and the Metta Sutta can sit in the same canon. Goodwill wished to all beings equally costs you nothing when a particular being changes or goes. Holding one person dear is a different operation, and it has a price the Buddha states plainly rather than softening.

Sorrow springs from attachment, fear springs from attachment; one free from attachment has no sorrow, let alone fear.
Dhammapada verse 213 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Identical to 212 with one word changed: pema for piya. The Mahāsaṅgīti edition of the Pali heads this verse Visākhāvatthu, “the story of Visākhā” — the great laywoman benefactor. Those editorial headings are later than the verses, but the canon itself carries the episode they point at. At Udāna 8.8 Visākhā comes to the Buddha in the middle of the day “with wet clothes and hair” because “the dear and beloved granddaughter of Visākhā, Migāra’s mother, had just passed away” (ud8.8:1.3–1.4, trans. Bhikkhu Sujato). The headings record how the tradition read these verses: as things said to bereaved people, not as maxims.

That’s so true, householder! That’s so true, householder! For our loved ones are a source of sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress.
Piyajātika Sutta MN 87:3.8–3.9 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

Said to a father who had stopped working and eating after his only child died, and who had taken to wailing at the cremation ground. The householder walks off calling it nonsense — “our loved ones are a source of joy and happiness” — and the whole discourse, whose Pali name Piyajātika means “born from the beloved”, turns on which of them is right. It is the least consoling thing in this collection, and the Buddha says it to a grieving man’s face.

If you were to decay and perish, my life would fall apart. How could sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress not arise in me?
Piyajātika Sutta MN 87:27.5 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The end of the same discourse. Queen Mallikā, having heard the teaching second-hand from the brahmin Nāḷijaṅgha, walks her husband King Pasenadi through it by asking five times whether he loves someone: Princess Vajirī, then Queen Vāsabhā, then his son General Viḍūḍabha, then herself, and finally — the list’s real sting — the realms of Kāsi and Kosala. He gives the same answer each time, and the passage above is the one about her. It is the sutta’s proof, supplied by a man in love. The teaching is not that he should love her less. It is that he already knows what his love is standing on.

If you have arrived at this page from a loss or a break-up, these verses are offered as reflection and not as advice; they were spoken to people training in renunciation. Our pages on grief and heartbreak take them up gently and at length.

Loving yourself, in the Buddha’s arithmetic

Having explored every quarter with the mind, one finds no one dearer than oneself. Likewise for others, each holds themselves dear; so one who desires self-knowledge would harm no other.
Mallikā Sutta SN 3.8 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The verse behind almost every “Buddha on self-love” meme, and the memes stop one line early. Upstairs in the royal longhouse, King Pasenadi asks Queen Mallikā whether there is “anyone more dear to you than yourself”, and each admits to the other that there is not; the king then goes down and reports the exchange to the Buddha, who neither scolds them nor congratulates them. He turns the admission outward: your self-preference is evidence about everyone else’s, so harm no one. The same verse is preserved word for word at Udāna 5.1, where the compilers title the episode Piyatarasutta, “Who is More Dear?” — piyatara, dearer, is the comparative of piya. See Buddhism and self-love.

The line everyone quotes — “looking after yourself, you look after others; and looking after others, you look after yourself” — sits inside the longer passage Buddha quotes on mindfulness prints in full, so we point there rather than reprint it.

It comes from a story about two pole acrobats. The tutor proposes that he and his apprentice Medakathālikā guard each other; she says no — each guards themselves, and that is how they both get down safely. The Buddha sides with the apprentice. Then he crosses the wires, and the crossing is the whole point of the discourse. You look after others by looking after yourself — “By development, cultivation, and practice of meditation”. And you look after yourself by looking after others — “By acceptance, harmlessness, love, and sympathy” (sn47.19:3.1–3.5). The “love” in that second list is mettacittatā, mettā again. It is the canon’s answer to whether caring for yourself is selfish, and it is neither yes nor no.

Love inside a household

Monastic renunciation is the setting for much of the canon, but a great deal of the Buddha’s advice on love was given to married people with children, and it is neither ascetic nor sentimental.

Caring for mother and father, kindness to children and partners, and unstressful work: this is the highest blessing.
Maṅgala Sutta Snp 2.4, verse 5 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

One of the blessings a deity comes to ask about, late at night, in Jeta’s Grove. You will often see “one of thirty-eight blessings” — thirty-eight is the traditional count of the separate items, drawn from the commentaries and given in Nārada Thera’s notes; the discourse itself never numbers them, as our page on the Maṅgala Sutta sets out. What is in the text is the company this line keeps: parents, children, partner — and a job that does not grind you down. The Pali anākulā ca kammantā means work that is not tangled or chaotic. Domestic love, in this discourse, is not a lesser consolation prize beside the monastic life; it is listed among the blessings without apology.

Householders, if wife and husband want to see each other in both this life and the next, they should be equals in faith, ethics, generosity, and wisdom.
Samajīvī Sutta AN 4.55 trans. Bhikkhu Sujato

The householders Nakulapitā and Nakulamātā had just told him, each in turn, that ever since they were married young neither could recall betraying the other “even in thought, still less in deed”, and that they wanted “to see each other in both this life and the next”. A teacher who thought attachment was the only thing going on here could have used the moment to correct them. Instead he answered the question as asked, and gave them four things to hold in common. The verses that follow add a domestic detail worth having: when both are “faithful and bountiful, disciplined, living righteously”, husband and wife “say nice things to each other” — aññamaññaṁ piyaṁvadā, piya once more, this time as ordinary marital kindness. Longer discussion at Buddhism and relationships, which also takes up the household advice in the Sigālaka Sutta — five duties each way between husband and wife, in a form that plainly reflects its own society.

Mahāyāna: the same love, made the engine

The Pali discourses treat mettā and karuṇā as qualities to cultivate. The Mahāyāna sūtras make compassion the engine of the whole path: it becomes bodhicitta, the intention to awaken for the sake of everyone. The most striking Mahāyāna statement of it takes the Metta Sutta’s mother-and-only-child image and puts it in a sick layman’s mouth. In the Vimalakīrti Sūtra, the layman Vimalakīrti explains his illness to the bodhisattva Mañjuśrī by saying that a bodhisattva loves all living beings as if each were his only child, becomes sick when they are sick, and is cured when they are cured — and that the sicknesses of bodhisattvas therefore arise from great compassion. Our page on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra prints Robert Thurman’s translation of the passage in full, at Toh 176, 4.7; it is a sūtra East Asian and Tibetan traditions hold as scripture and the Theravāda canon does not contain.

The shift is real and worth naming: Snp 1.8 asks you to unfold a heart like a mother’s, while Vimalakīrti says the bodhisattva gets sick with you. Theravāda’s manual tradition is wary of exactly that collapse — it treats grief, sliding into the sufferer’s own despair, as the counterfeit that most closely resembles compassion, which is the “near enemy” scheme our page on the four brahmavihāras sets out from the Visuddhimagga. Nyanaponika Thera puts the guard in one sentence: “The compassion of the wise man does not render him a victim of suffering.” Mahāyāna makes the sickness the vocation instead. Our guide to Buddhist scriptures sets the canons side by side.

Lines about love the Buddha never said

Four of the most-shared “Buddha quotes on love” do not appear in the discourses at all. A phrase search of SuttaCentral’s English translations returns nothing for any of these:

And one that is usually offered as the genuine exception, which needs a more careful answer than either yes or no. “Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love; this is the eternal rule” is the wording on a thousand posters, and we have not been able to trace it to any translator or edition. It is not F. Max Müller’s, although it is often credited to him: his rendering of Dhammapada 5 for The Sacred Books of the East reads, “For hatred does not cease by hatred at any time: hatred ceases by love, this is an old rule” (Project Gutenberg eBook 2017). Neither “but only by love” nor “eternal rule” occurs anywhere in his Dhammapada. So the verse is real — it is Dhammapada 5, printed in Sujato’s translation on Buddha quotes on anger — and the famous English sentence is somebody’s later tidying of it, by a hand we cannot name. That is how most of these lines are made: not invented, but smoothed until the source no longer recognises them. The rule on the quotes hub is blunter — if we can’t trace it, we don’t print it — and this entry is the documented exception that proves it: we print the poster line only to say, with the evidence, that nobody can source it.

Later teachers on love, clearly labelled

Some of the best-loved “Buddhist” lines about love are genuine, but they belong to named teachers writing centuries or millennia after the Buddha. We keep them separate rather than folding them into his voice:

For the whole sourced collection, see Buddhist quotes; for the text half the verse-form passages above come from, see the Dhammapada and its glossary entry, and for the canon that holds them all, the Pali Canon. The single quality this page keeps returning to has its own entry too: mettā.

Share
Pinterest X Facebook WhatsApp Email

Frequently asked questions

What did the Buddha say about love?

He said several different things, because he used several different words. He taught metta (goodwill), karuna (compassion) and mudita (gladness at another's good fortune) as qualities to extend to every being without exception. He also said that piya and pema — holding a particular person dear — are where sorrow and fear come from. Both sets of statements are his.

Did the Buddha say that love causes suffering?

He said that what we hold dear does. Dhammapada 212 reads, in Bhikkhu Sujato's translation, 'Sorrow springs from what we hold dear, fear springs from what we hold dear.' The Pali word there is piya, a particular beloved person or thing — not metta, the boundless goodwill he told everyone to cultivate. He never said goodwill causes suffering.

What is the difference between metta and pema?

Metta is goodwill extended to all beings equally and without conditions; it is trained, boundless, and the Buddha praised it without reservation. Pema is fond attachment to one particular person. Dhammapada 213 says sorrow and fear spring from pema. Most English 'Buddha quotes on love' pages translate both words as love, which is why they read as if he contradicted himself.

Is 'you, yourself, deserve your love and affection' a real Buddha quote?

There is no such line in the discourses. A phrase search of SuttaCentral's English translations returns nothing for it. The verse usually offered as its source is SN 3.8, where the Buddha observes that nobody finds anyone dearer than themselves — and then draws a different conclusion from it: since everyone else feels the same, harm no one.

What is the most famous Buddha quote about love?

Dhammapada 5, which Bhikkhu Sujato renders 'For never is hatred laid to rest by hate, it's laid to rest by love: this is an ancient teaching.' It circulates in dozens of wordings, often with no reference attached. It is genuine, and it has an address: verse 5 of the Dhammapada, in the chapter called The Pairs.

Sources