Ullambana: The Buddhist Ghost Festival
Ullambana — the Buddhist “Ghost Festival” — is an East Asian festival of the dead, kept on the 15th day of the 7th lunar month, on which people make offerings to the monastic community and to their ancestors and transfer the merit to their departed parents and to suffering hungry ghosts.
Known in China as Yulanpen and in Japan as Obon, it grows from the story of the disciple Mulian — the monk we met in Pāli as Mahā Moggallāna — rescuing his mother from a wretched rebirth. It is among the most tender of the Buddhist festivals.
The story of Mulian and his mother
At the festival’s heart is the story of Mulian and his mother, as the Yulanpen Sūtra tells it. Mulian — the Chinese name for Maudgalyāyana, the disciple foremost in psychic power — having just gained the six supernormal powers, used his spiritual sight to seek out his deceased mother. He found her reborn among the hungry ghosts (pretas), with nothing to eat or drink, reduced to skin and bone. When he filled his bowl with rice and took it to her, the food turned to burning coals before it reached her mouth.
Grief-stricken and unable to free her alone, Mulian went to the Buddha. The Buddha explained that the burden of her past deeds was too heavy for any single person to lift — but that the combined merit of the whole monastic community, offered on his mother’s behalf at the close of the rains retreat, could reach where he could not. Mulian made the offering, and his mother was released. The festival re-enacts that rescue every year: through generosity to the Sangha and the transfer of merit, the living reach back to help the dead.
The story did not stop with the sūtra. Among the documents found at Dunhuang, the Silk Road city in north-west China, are eleven manuscripts of a tenth-century popular retelling, the Transformation Text on Mahāmaudgalyāyana Rescuing His Mother from the Underworld — a bianwen, a genre that grew out of storytellers singing and narrating to pictures. There Mulian searches the hells and finds his mother in the lowest of them, Avīci; the Buddha tells him that offering food and drink to the monks on the fifteenth day of the seventh month will save her, and in the end she is reborn as a human and rises to the Heaven of the Thirty-three. The scholar Ryu Takai, who has examined one of those manuscripts at the British Library, judges that the retelling enjoyed significant popularity in its day. It is a later work, separate from the sūtra, and it helps to know which of the two a telling follows.
Many names, one festival
The festival travelled, and took on many names — worth keeping straight:
- Ullambana / Yulanpen (盂蘭盆) is the Buddhist name (the Japanese Bon is a shortening of Ullambana).
- Zhongyuan (中元) is the Daoist name for the same day, honouring a different festival calendar that happens to coincide.
- The “Hungry Ghost Festival” is the popular, folk name, wrapped in customs about wandering spirits let loose during the seventh “ghost month.”
- Obon (お盆) is the Japanese form.
This overlap is itself instructive: Ullambana is an East Asian observance — Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese — in which Mahayana Buddhism, Daoism, and older folk religion have long intermingled. It is not a Theravada festival, and one should be careful not to flatten its distinct Buddhist, Daoist, and folk strands into a single thing.
The scripture — and an honest note
The Buddhist basis of the festival is the Yulanpen Sūtra (the Ullambana Sūtra), which tells the Mulian story. Here honesty about sources, which this site holds to, requires a clear note: the Yulanpen Sūtra is widely regarded in modern scholarship as a Chinese composition — an “apocryphon” — rather than a translation of an Indian scripture. No Indic original survives, and the text places great weight on filial piety, the Confucian devotion to one’s parents that runs deep in Chinese culture. The standard scholarly study, Stephen Teiser’s The Ghost Festival in Medieval China, traces how the festival rose to prominence in medieval China on exactly this fusion of Buddhist merit and Chinese reverence for ancestors. The Chinese-composition view has its challengers, though: Seishi Karashima argued in a 2013 paper that the sūtra is not apocryphal, and Xiaohuan Zhao, of the University of Sydney, makes the case for its Indic origins in Chindian Myth of Mulian Rescuing His Mother (2023).
None of this lessens the festival’s meaning for the millions who keep it. But it would be inaccurate to present the sūtra as canonically Indian, and so we don’t. What the festival unmistakably is — a yearly act of love toward the dead — needs no false pedigree.
When it falls
Ullambana is kept on the 15th day of the 7th lunar month, the high point of the “ghost month” of Chinese tradition — usually falling in August by the Western calendar. Japan’s Obon varies by region: most of the country keeps it around 15 August, parts of Tokyo in mid-July, and some areas still by the old lunar date. As ever with the Buddhist calendar, there is no single fixed day.
How it is observed
The festival’s acts all flow from the Mulian story. Families make offerings of food to the monastic community, understood as the “field of merit” through which help reaches the departed; they set out offerings for their ancestors and for the wandering, unclaimed “orphan” ghosts who have no descendants to feed them; and they transfer the merit of all this giving to their parents and forebears. In Japan, Obon adds its own gentle customs: visiting and tidying family graves, lighting lanterns to welcome the ancestral spirits home and to see them off again, and the communal Bon-odori folk dance of welcome.
Beneath the imagery of ghosts and merit lies something simply human: the wish to care for those we have lost, and the refusal to believe that death ends our responsibilities to them. For anyone carrying such a loss, our reflections on grief may be a quieter companion; for the beings the festival reaches toward, see hungry ghosts; for its Japanese form, Obon; and for the disciple whose love began it all, Mahā Moggallāna.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ullambana?
Ullambana (Chinese: Yulanpen) is an East Asian Buddhist festival of the dead, kept on the 15th day of the 7th lunar month. People make offerings to the monastic community and to their ancestors, and transfer the merit to their departed parents and to suffering 'hungry ghosts.' It is rooted in the story of the disciple Mulian, known in Pāli as Mahā Moggallāna, rescuing his mother from rebirth among the hungry ghosts.
What is the story behind the Ghost Festival?
The disciple Mulian (Maudgalyāyana / Mahā Moggallāna), foremost in psychic power, used his spiritual sight to find his deceased mother, and saw she had been reborn among the hungry ghosts, unable to eat. Unable to free her himself, he asked the Buddha, who told him to make offerings to the whole monastic community at the end of the rains retreat. Through that merit his mother was released, and the festival re-enacts this yearly.
Is Ullambana the same as Obon?
Essentially, yes. Obon is the Japanese form of the same festival; the word 'Bon' is a shortening of 'Ullambana'. In China it is Yulanpen, the Ghost Festival. Japan adds its own customs, such as visiting family graves, lighting lanterns to welcome the ancestral spirits home, and the Bon-odori dance, but the root is the same story and the same purpose: caring, through offerings and merit, for the dead.
Is the Ullambana Sutra a genuine Indian scripture?
On the prevailing view, probably not, though it is debated. Modern scholarship widely regards the Yulanpen (Ullambana) Sūtra as a Chinese composition, an 'apocryphon', partly because no Indic version survives and because it foregrounds Confucian filial piety. Seishi Karashima argued in 2013 that it is not apocryphal, and Xiaohuan Zhao argued in 2023 for its Indic origins. Either way, it would be inaccurate to present the sūtra as certainly Indian.
Sources
- Stephen F. Teiser, 'The Ghost Festival in Medieval China' (Princeton University Press, 1988) — the standard scholarly study, which translates the Yulanpen Sūtra and treats it as a Chinese composition
- Yulanpen (Ullambana) Sūtra — the source of the Mulian / Maudgalyāyana story; widely regarded in modern scholarship as a Chinese apocryphon (no surviving Indic original), foregrounding filial piety
- The festival's names: Ullambana / Yulanpen (盂蘭盆, Buddhist); Zhongyuan (中元, Daoist); the popular 'Ghost Festival'; and the Japanese Obon (お盆) — kept on the 15th day of the 7th lunar month
- Fo shuo Yulanpen jing (佛說盂蘭盆經, T685), attributed to Dharmarakṣa of the Western Jin (西晉月氏三藏竺法護譯), CBETA (English renderings here are the site's own) — Great Maudgalyāyana (大目乾連), having just gained the six supernormal powers (始得六通), sees his dead mother born among the hungry ghosts, with no food or drink, skin and bone (見其亡母生餓鬼中,不見飲食,皮骨連立); the bowl of rice he takes her turns to burning coals before it enters her mouth (食未入口,化成火炭); the Buddha says her offences are beyond his power alone (非汝一人力所奈何) and need the power of the monks of the ten directions (十方眾僧威神之力); offerings on the fifteenth day of the seventh month, at the monks' pravāraṇā (七月十五日僧自恣時); that day she is freed from the suffering of a hungry ghost; filial disciples are to make the offering every year (年年七月十五日)
- Ryu Takai (Ryukoku University), 'A Study of Dunhuang Manuscript S.2614V, Mahāmaudgalyāyana Rescuing His Mother from the Underworld: Revisions and Textual Transmission', Sino-Platonic Papers 378 (January 2026, ed. Victor H. Mair, University of Pennsylvania) — the Transformation Text on Maudgalyāyana (Mulian bianwen 目連變文) narrates the Buddhist disciple Maudgalyāyana (Mulian 目連) rescuing his mother, who had fallen into hell; a work of Chinese popular literature from the tenth century, in eleven Dunhuang manuscripts (S.2614V copied in 921); bianwen derive from performers who sang and narrated stories while displaying pictures; he finds his mother in the Avīci Hell, the Buddha tells him that donating food and drink to the clergy on the fifteenth day of the seventh month will save her, and she is finally reborn as a human and ascends to the Heaven of the Thirty-three; the date coincides with the conclusion of varṣā; the text enjoyed significant popularity at the time
- Mun-keat Choong (University of New England), 'A comparison of the Chinese and Pāli Saṃyukta/Saṃyuttas on the Venerable Mahā-Maudgalyāyana (Mahā-Moggallāna)', Buddhist Studies Review 34.1 (2017), 67–84, copy hosted by the UK Association for Buddhist Studies, on whose behalf the journal is published — Maudgalyāyana (P. Moggallāna, 目犍連 Muqianlian); Mahā-Maudgalyāyana, ‘Maudgalyāyana the Great’ (P. Mahā-Moggallāna, 大目犍連), the second of the Buddha's most eminent monk-disciples after Śāriputra, well known for his skill in supernormal or psychic power (Skt ṛddhi, P. iddhi)
- Etadagga Vagga (AN 1.188–197), trans. Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral — ‘The foremost of my monk disciples … with psychic power is Mahāmoggallāna’ (AN 1.190)
- Issho Fujita, 'August – Urabon-e', sermon archive, Sōtōshū (Sōtō Zen) official English site — the origin of the Bon food-offering is the story of Maha Maudgalyayana (Mokuren) in the Ullambana Sutra; the Buddha tells him to make offerings to the monks on the final day of the 90-day summer retreat (the 15th day of the seventh month); his mother was saved not by her son alone nor by the Buddha but by the practice-power of the sangha
- Seishi Karashima, 'The Meaning of Yulanpen 盂蘭盆 – ‘Rice Bowl’ on Pravāranā Day', Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 16 (2013), 289–306: bibliographic record with table of contents, Digital Library of Buddhist Studies, National Taiwan University — section 7 is headed ‘The Yulanpen jing 盂蘭盆經 is not apocryphal’ (supports only that Karashima argued the sūtra is not apocryphal; the full text was not reached)
- Xiaohuan Zhao (University of Sydney), 'Chindian Myth of Mulian Rescuing His Mother – On Indic Origins of the Yulanpen Sūtra: Debate and Discussion' (Anthem Press, September 2023), publisher's description — the sūtra, traditionally attributed to Dharmarakṣa (Zhu Fahu, ca. 266–308), is now widely believed to have been created by Chinese Buddhists, on the grounds that no Yulanpen Sūtra survives in Indic sources and that it stresses Confucian filial piety and ancestor worship; the book reviews the arguments prevailing in modern scholarship against its authenticity and argues for its Indic origins