e‑Buddhism.com

The Avatamsaka Sutra: Indra's Net and Sudhana

The Avatamsaka Sutra: an open palm-leaf manuscript (ink-wash illustration)
Illustration: AI-generated ink-wash art for e-Buddhism.com · how we use AI

The Avataṃsaka Sūtra — the Flower Ornament or Flower Garland Sutra — is the vast Mahāyāna scripture catalogued as Toh 44 in the Tibetan Kangyur and, in Śikṣānanda’s Chinese, as Taishō 279. Its Buddha never speaks. Two of its chapters, the Daśabhūmika and the Gaṇḍavyūha, also circulate as sūtras in their own right.

This page gives the words and their setting. The doctrine belongs to emptiness and dependent origination; the canon to Buddhist scriptures.

What is the Avatamsaka Sutra?

Less a discourse than a library bound as one book: forty-five chapters in the Tibetan version, 115 fascicles, four volumes of the Degé Kangyur. The first forty-four happen in the two weeks after the awakening, while the Buddha sits silent under the Bodhi tree and simultaneously in Indra’s Trāyastriṃśa paradise atop Sumeru and three heavens above it. 84000’s introduction is blunt: “the Buddha Śākyamuni never speaks: all the teachings in the forty-five chapters of the Avataṃsaka are given by others.” Bodhisattvas teach in his presence — Samantabhadra, Mañjuśrī, Vajragarbha — and Śākyamuni is one of countless manifestations of Vairocana.

How the Flower Ornament Sutra grew, and what its name means

It expanded as it travelled. Buddhabhadra’s Chinese, completed in 420, had thirty-four sūtras. Queen Wu of the Tang, hearing of a longer version in Khotan, sponsored a fresh translation under the Khotanese Śikṣānanda (652–710): thirty-nine chapters, finished in 699, the queen supplying a preface and titles. In 798 the Kashmiri monk Prajñā translated something narrower — a longer version of the final chapter alone, the Gaṇḍavyūha, as an independent Chinese sūtra (Taishō 293). The Tibetan, made in the early ninth century by Yeshé Dé, Jinamitra and Surendrabodhi, has forty-five chapters.

The English titles disagree because the Sanskrit does. In classical Sanskrit avataṃsa “describes a garland or any circular ornamentation”; in Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit avataṃsaka means “a great number,” “a multitude,” or “a collection.” Tibetan took the second sense (phal po che), Chinese the first (huayan, flower garland) — hence Cleary’s Flower Ornament Scripture.

The Ten Bhumis: the chapter that left home

Chapter 31, the Daśabhūmika, “first existed as an independent sūtra,” and still exists as one in Sanskrit manuscripts.

Then the Bhagavat was in the deva king Vaśavartin’s divine palace of precious jewels, together with a great saṅgha of bodhisattvas. They were all irreversible and one lifetime away from attaining the highest complete enlightenment. They had gathered there from various worlds.
The Ten Bhūmis (Daśabhūmika) 1.1 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

That abrupt “Then” is a scar. In Chinese the chapter still opens “Thus did I hear”; adapted for the Tibetan into a chapter of a longer work, it lost that opening, and part of its introduction was transferred to its conclusion. The Bhagavat present says nothing — the teaching is Vajragarbha’s. The grounds themselves belong to our guide to the ten bhūmis.

The Gandavyuha: Sudhana’s pilgrimage, in the sutra’s own words

The last chapter is the one people read: “by far the longest sūtra or chapter, comprising about a third of the Avataṃsaka Sūtra.” 84000 renders its obscure title The Stem Array; the name, it says, “appears to have no connection with the content, unless it is taken to refer to the successive joints in a bamboo stem, as an analogy to the successive episodes in Sudhana’s journey.”

The Bhagavat was in Śrāvastī, in a greatly adorned kūṭāgāra in Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s park, together with the bodhisattvas Samantabhadra, Mañjuśrī, and others…
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 1.1 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

This is the one part of the Avataṃsaka set later in the Buddha’s life, in the monastery of the Pali discourses rather than a heaven. And kūṭāgāra is left untranslated: 84000’s glossary makes it an Indian hall or temple with “one ground-floor room and a high ornamental roof” that “contains at least one additional upper room,” its top “more usually a tapering roof, tower, or spire.” The word, it adds, “literally means ‘upper chamber’.”

Mañjuśrī leaves for south India and meets a head merchant’s son, Sudhana, “Excellent Wealth” — so named because his parents, his relatives and the brahmin prognosticators said, “As soon as he was born there appeared this perfection of much wealth” (3.34). His instruction sets the pattern:

Therefore, noble one, bodhisattvas should gain certain knowledge from true kalyāṇamitras. They should be tireless in their search for kalyāṇamitras… They should not become angered by the kalyāṇamitras’ conduct of skillful methods.
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 3.93 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

Kalyāṇamitra stays untranslated because English flattens it: 84000 glosses the Sanskrit “good friend” or “beneficial friend,” the Tibetan “virtuous friend,” a title for a teacher. Sudhana’s teachers include the laywoman Āśā, a courtesan, night goddesses, an ascetic amid fires, and Mahādeva — Śiva. Again and again an episode closes with the same refrain — “I know only this bodhisattva liberation” — and the teacher sends him on. In chapter 30 he meets Avalokiteśvara as an apparently human guru on the Potalaka Mountain, “with no mention of his association with Amitābha’s pure realm of Sukhāvatī” — the world the Amitabha Sutra describes.

Where does Indra’s net actually come from?

Most readers arrive for one image: a net of jewels, each reflecting all the others without end. The evidence is worth stating exactly. Four of the forty-five chapters have been published in English from the Tibetan, and in the longest the phrase occurs once in English — in Maitreya’s similes for bodhicitta. Three from a run of roughly a hundred:

…It is like Indra’s net of illusions because it draws in the asuras of the kleśas. It is like Varuṇa’s noose because it draws in those to be guided. It is like Indra’s fire because it incinerates all propensities, predispositions, and kleśas…
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 54.210 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

What the net does is draw in: the asuras, the warring titans, here figuring the kleśas, the defilements. It is a snare, not a mirror. The qualifier “in English” does real work: at 20.31 the same translation reads “the net of conduct is like a magical illusion,” and 84000’s endnote there says the Tibetan is literally “the net of Indra,” and that “the wordplay is lost in translation.” Jewelled nets appear elsewhere as ornament — at 41.1 a night goddess has “a body covered completely in a net of jewels.”

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy calls Indra’s net “one of the metaphors from the Avatamsaka Sutra” used to illustrate mutual interdependence, and traces the picture itself to “pre-Buddhist myth,” in which “the god Indra has a net with a jewel at the intersection of every two strands” — an image, it says, “adopted as a metaphor.” The published Tibetan chapters show something narrower.

In Huayan hands it does philosophical work. The same entry glosses the second of Zhiyan’s ten mysteries as each thing reflecting all others “and so on ad infinitum, akin to a jewel of Indra’s net.” Fazang (643–712), “the third patriarch and systematizer” of the school, taught with it: the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy records that “to render the sutra comprehensible to his imperial patrons and to the masses of Buddhist faithful, he used metaphors such as Indra’s Net of Jewels and the Golden Lion.” It also describes his hall of ten mirrors — eight in an octagon, one above and one below, a Buddha statue at the centre.

Maitreya’s tower: everything inside everything

For that vision in the sūtra’s own words, go to Maitreya’s kūṭāgāra, the scene Borobudur’s builders carved most obsessively.

The bodhisattva Maitreya came in front of the door of the Vairocanavyūhālaṃkāragarbha kūṭāgāra. With his right hand he snapped his fingers, and with that sound the door opened. He said, “Noble son, enter the kūṭāgāra.”
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 54.323 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

The building carries Vairocana’s name, and that is as close to a doctrinal statement as the scene comes. Nothing is argued; a door opens at a sound. Inside is a hall hundreds of thousands of yojanas wide — and inside it a hundred thousand more like it:

He saw that these kūṭāgāras were perfectly arranged so that in a single perception they appeared in the manner of reflections that were separate from one another, not mingled with one another, and distinct from one another, and so that they appeared with all of them without exception being perceived in a single perception.
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 54.327 trans. Peter Alan Roberts

Notice what the sentence protects. The towers do not merge: they stay “separate,” “not mingled,” “distinct” — and are seen at once. That refusal to dissolve difference is why the passage needs the word reflections, and it is the seed the Huayan writers grew.

How the sutra ends, and what is still recited

Sudhana returns briefly to Mañjuśrī, then comes at last to Samantabhadra, who closes the Avataṃsaka with a prayer of sixty-two verses.

There are as many buddhas as atoms within a single atom,
Seated in the midst of bodhisattvas.
I focus on the entire realm of phenomena,
Without exception, being filled by jinas in that way.
The Stem Array (Gaṇḍavyūha) 56.74 (verse 3) trans. Peter Alan Roberts

Here is “one contains all” in the first person — something a reciter says, not a thesis anyone argues. 84000 dates the prayer last: earlier versions ended with the Maitreya chapter, the Mañjuśrī and Samantabhadra chapters came afterwards, and then the prayer, “which has continued to exist as an independent text.” It stands in the Kangyur alone as Toh 1095, in sixty-three verses, marked off by a homage to Mañjuśrīkumārabhūta at the front and an extra verse at the end. 84000 notes it “is regularly recited,” its first twelve verses “often incorporated into sādhanas” in Tibetan Buddhism.

Which translation of the Avatamsaka Sutra to read

TranslatorWhat it covers
Thomas Cleary (1993)The whole sūtra from Śikṣānanda’s Chinese, as The Flower Ornament Scripture — the only complete English version 84000’s survey lists
84000, from the TibetanFour chapters: The Ten Bhūmis, The Stem Array (Peter Alan Roberts, 2021), The Chapter on the Scale of Life (Subhashita Translation Group, 2022), The Dwellings of Bodhisattvas (Thupten Tashi, 2023)
Patrick CarréŚikṣānanda’s Chinese, in French
Douglas OstoParts of the Gaṇḍavyūha from Sanskrit, as The Supreme Array

Prajñā’s 798 text — the longest Chinese version of the Gaṇḍavyūha, not of the whole Avataṃsaka — is still unavailable in English: 84000 says there is “as yet no translation” of it.

Where traditions differ, and how the sutra is used

The Avataṃsaka is a Mahāyāna scripture, kept in the Chinese and Tibetan canons and not in the Pali canon that Theravāda Buddhism keeps.

In China it was Śikṣānanda’s version that, in 84000’s words, “became the basis for the Huayan School of Chinese Buddhism.” Its patriarchs are older than that translation: the Stanford Encyclopedia gives Dushun (557–640) “the posthumous honor of being known as the first patriarch of the Huayan School” and identifies Zhiyan (602–668) as the second, both before Fazang — which is why our guide to Buddhism in China dates Huayan’s rise to the sixth century. The school “spread to Korea (where it was known as ‘Hwaeom’) and to Japan (where it was called ‘Kegon’).” Its Chinese vitality lapsed after Emperor Wuzong’s persecution — dated 842–846 by the Stanford Encyclopedia, while that guide gives its severest episode, the Huichang suppression of 845 — but its “doctrines, metaphors, and vocabulary had a significant influence on Chan (Zen) Buddhism”: Li Tongxuan’s work reached the Korean monk Chinul (1158–1210) and the Linji Chan masters, which is how this sūtra shaped Zen.

In Tibet its chapters travel separately, the Daśabhūmika anchoring the stages-of-the-path literature and the closing prayer serving as liturgy; in Nepal the Gaṇḍavyūha “remains one of the nine central works of Newar Buddhism.” In ninth-century Java it was carved: at Borobudur the Gaṇḍavyūha and the Bhadracarī prayer that closes it run together across 460 panels on five registers — the main wall of the second level, the main wall and balustrade of the third, and the balustrade and main wall of the fourth.

Read the sutra itself

84000 has four chapters free and in full: The Stem Array, The Ten Bhūmis, The Chapter on the Scale of Life and The Dwellings of Bodhisattvas; the closing prayer stands alone as The Prayer of Good Conduct. For the rest, Cleary. See also the Lotus Sutra, Vimalakirti Sutra, Lankavatara Sutra, Amitabha Sutra and Surangama Sutra.

Share
Pinterest X Facebook WhatsApp Email

Frequently asked questions

What is the Avatamsaka Sutra?

The Avatamsaka or Flower Ornament Sutra is a very large Mahayana scripture, catalogued as Toh 44 in the Tibetan Kangyur and, in Sikshananda's Chinese, as Taisho 279. It is really a library bound as one sutra: forty-five chapters in the Tibetan version, several of which also circulate alone. Its Buddha sits silent throughout and bodhisattvas do the teaching.

Is Indra's net in the Avatamsaka Sutra?

Not in the form most readers expect. Four of its forty-five chapters have been published in English from the Tibetan, and in the longest the phrase appears once, as Indra's net of illusions, a snare that draws in the asuras. The endlessly reflecting jewelled net is what the Huayan commentators made of it; the Stanford Encyclopedia calls it a metaphor from the sutra and traces the picture itself to pre-Buddhist myth.

What is the Gandavyuha Sutra?

It is the forty-fifth and final chapter of the Avatamsaka and about a third of its length, and it also circulates as a sutra in its own right. It follows a young man named Sudhana, sent on his way by Manjushri, from teacher to teacher across south India. His teachers include a laywoman, a courtesan, night goddesses and non-Buddhist ascetics.

Why does the Buddha never speak in the Avatamsaka Sutra?

Because the sutra is set in the silence after his awakening. The introduction to 84000's translation of The Stem Array states plainly that the Buddha Shakyamuni never speaks and that all the teachings in the forty-five chapters are given by others. Bodhisattvas such as Samantabhadra, Manjushri and Vajragarbha speak in his presence, and he is understood as a manifestation of the Buddha Vairocana.

Which translation of the Avatamsaka Sutra should I read?

It depends which sutra you want. Thomas Cleary's The Flower Ornament Scripture, published in 1993, renders the whole work from Sikshananda's Chinese, and is the only complete English translation 84000's survey of Western-language versions lists. For the Tibetan text with scholarly introductions, 84000 has so far published four of the forty-five chapters, free and in full.

Sources